Behavioural Parameters Analysis in Unpredictable Chronic Stress (UCS) Induced Animal Model after Treatment with the Biofield Energy Healing Based Test Formulation

Behavioural Parameters Analysis in Unpredictable Chronic Stress (UCS) Induced Animal Model after Treatment with the Biofield Energy Healing Based Test Formulation

Health & Wellness

The aim of the present study was to study the behavioural parameters in unpredictable chronic stress (UCS) of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment (The Trivedi Effect®) based novel test formulation in male Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model. A test formulation composition included minerals (magnesium, zinc, copper, calcium, selenium, and iron), vitamins (ascorbic acid, pyridoxine HCl, alpha tocopherol, cyanocobalamin, and cholecalciferol), Panax ginseng extract, β-carotene, and cannabidiol isolate. The constituents of the test formulation were divided into two parts; one section was defined as untreated test formulation, while the other portion of test formulation and the animals received Biofield Energy Healing Treatment by a renowned Biofield Energy Healer, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi. The experimental results showed Y maze test data showed time in start arm was significantly decreased by 76.92%, 34.33%, 24.63%, 55.52%, and 74.93% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the G2. However, time in the novel arm was increased by 110.02%, 59.13%, 36.54%, 130.15%, and 97.61% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the G4. Y maze test showed that entry in start arm was increased by 141.67% and 91.67% in the G6 and G7 group, respectively as compared with the G4. In addition, entry in explored arm was increased by 153.85% and 61.54% in the G6 and G7 groups, respectively as compared with the G4 group. Morris water Maze results showed that maximum speed in zone was increased by 64.34%, 71.95%, 20.84%, 79.28%, and 109.49% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared with the G2. Similarly, the resting time in zone was significantly decreased by 86.27%, 82.74%, 77.89%, 53.86%, and 80.28% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared with the G2. Latency in target zone record showed that 87.74%, 87.94%, 66.89%, 87.59%, and 81.88% decreased values in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared with the G2, while entry in target zone was significantly increased by 215%, 110%, 190%, 125%, and 115% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared with the G2. Forced swim test data showed that number of climbing data suggested that G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups showed an increased value by 101.34%, 146.04%, 93.04%, 141.30% and 125.39% respectively, as compared with the disease control G2 group, while immobility time (sec.) data showed that G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups showed a decreased time by 51.58%, 70.95%, 37.05%, 73.35%, and 58.11% respectively, as compared with the disease control G2 group. Similarly, swim time data showed increased values by 21.69%, 29.83%, 15.58%, 30.84%, and 24.43% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the disease control G2 group. However, total number of square crossed was increased by 62.18%, 94.55%, 26.55%, 25.80%, and 26.55% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the disease control G2 group. Similarly, entries in the center zone was also significantly increased by 233.33%, 600%, 366.67%, 34.11%, and 200% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the disease control G2 group. Elevated Plus Maze results showed that time spent into the open arm was significantly increased by 2458%, 1460%, 1750%, 1079%, and 969% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the G2. In addition, the entries in open arm behaviour was reported and found to be increased by 375%, 275%, 400%, 243%, and 200% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups respectively, as compared with the G2. On the other hand, sucrose preference test was significant increased by 37.09%, 35.63%, and 26.15% in the G5, G6, and G7 groups respectively, as compared with the G2. Overall, the data suggested a significant effect of Biofield Energy per se along with preventive measure on the animal with respect to various spatial learning and memory disorders. The results also showed the significant improvement of spontaneous alternation and a recognition memory test response that helps towards various diseases, allergies, lethargic conditions, energy booster action along with its associated complications/symptoms can be preventive using Biofield Energy Treatment per se and/or Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation groups.

Trivedi MK, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G and Jana S

Academic Strive

30-Jan-2020

[no text]

[no text]

[no text]

[no text]

English

Journal Article

[no text]

[no text]