Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers Analysis of Biofield Treated Proprietary Test Formulation in Heart Tissues in Cecal Slurry, LPS and E. Coli-induced Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in Sprague Dawley Rats

Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers Analysis of Biofield Treated Proprietary Test Formulation in Heart Tissues in Cecal Slurry, LPS and E. Coli-induced Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in Sprague Dawley Rats

Health & Wellness

The study was aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory biomarkers in heart tissues after treatment with the Biofield Energy Treated Proprietary Test Formulation and Biofield Energy Treatment per se to the animals on Cecal Slurry, LPS and E. coli-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) model in Sprague Dawley rats. In this experiment, different antioxidants biomarkers such as myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), lipid peroxidase (LPO) and proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) were analysed using ELISA assay in heart homogenate. A proprietary test formulation was formulated including minerals (magnesium, zinc, calcium, selenium, and iron), vitamins (ascorbic acid, pyridoxine HCl, vitamin E, cyanocobalamin, and cholecalciferol), Panax ginseng extract, β-carotene, and cannabidiol isolate. The constituents of the test formulation were divided into two parts; one section was defined as the untreated test formulation, while the other portion of the test formulation and the animals received Biofield Energy Healing Treatment remotely for about 3 minutes by a renowned Biofield Energy Healer, Mr. Mahendra Kumar Trivedi. The level of MPO was reduced by 12.07% in the G6 (Cecal Slurry, LPS and E. coli along with Biofield Energy Treatment per se to animals from day -15) group as compared to the untreated test formulation (G4) group. Moreover, the level of SOD was significantly (p≤0.05) increased by 19.03%, 17.26%, and 11.81% in the G6, G7, and G9 groups, respectively as compared to the G4 group. The level of TNF-α was significantly decreased by 25.97%, 40.28% (p≤0.01), 24.86%, 36.54% (p≤0.01), and 34.30% in the G5, G6, G7, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared to the disease control (G2) group. Moreover, the level of IL-6 was significantly (p≤0.001) decreased by 23.5%, 31.0%, 26.3%, and 39.8% in the G5, G6, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared to the G2 group. Additionally, the level of MIP-2 was reduced by 26.7% and 19.5% in the G6 and G8 groups, respectively as compared to the G4 group. Besides, the level of MMP-9 was significantly (p≤0.001) reduced by 15.1%, 21.5%, and 34% in the G6, G8, and G9 groups, respectively as compared to the G4 group. Altogether, the data imply the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation and Biofield Energy Treatment per se along with preventive measure on the animal with respect to various inflammatory conditions that might be beneficial various types of systemic inflammatory disorders specially sepsis, trauma, septic shock or any types of cardiac injuries. Therefore, the results showed the significant slowdown the inflammation-related disease progression and its complications/symptoms in the preventive Biofield Energy Treatment group per se and/or Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation groups (viz. G6, G7, G8, and G9) comparatively with the disease control group.

Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi and Snehasis Jana

Juniper Publishers

13-Jul-2021

[no text]

[no text]

[no text]

[no text]

English

Journal Article

[no text]

[no text]

[no text]